Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report
От | Rob Brown-Bayliss |
---|---|
Тема | Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1028524428.5677.13.camel@everglade.zoism.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report
Re: O'Reilly Open Source Convention Report |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 14:17, Tom Lane wrote: > We did well I thought, though it still seemed that MySQL had a larger > presence at the conference than PG. Maybe next year ;-) Without flames whats the story there? For example I read an interviwew this week (on the web, cant recall where) where an guy from SUN briefly mentioned putting MySQL up Oracle, in the context of providing a complete package... Wouldn't PostgreSQL be a better contender due to the more advanced features (assuming Mysql has not caught up) My basic understanding was MySQL was being pushed for speed rather than features, whilst PostgreSQL was more feature rich and robust... Any calm and reasond answeres? -- * * Rob Brown-Bayliss *
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: