Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10278.1438785168@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Wasn't the point that 32 bit AIX as a whole hasn't been supported for a > couple years now? My willingness to expend effort for that is rather > limited. Well, there's one in the buildfarm. We don't generally turn off buildfarm critters just because the underlying OS is out of support (the population would be quite a bit lower if we did). > I mean I'd otherwise ok with a PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE flag that takes > effect in c.h or so. That could easily be set in src/template/aix. Might > also be useful for investigatory purposes every couple years or so. +1, that could have other use-cases. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: