Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10266.1050588320@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Sean Chittenden writes: >> I don't think these should be hacked into the backend/libpq, but I >> think it'd be a huge win to hack in "show *" support into psql for >> MySQL users so they can type: >> >> SHOW (databases|tables|views|functions|triggers|schemas); > Well, we (will) have the information schema, and if you like you can put > it in the path and write > select * from tables; > etc., which seems just as good. I think Sean's idea is not to make it "just as easy as MySQL", it's to make it "the *same* as MySQL", for the benefit of those that refuse to learn differently. Them as won't adjust to "\dt" in place of "show tables" aren't likely to adjust to "select * from tables" either. Not even (maybe especially not) if it's arguably a standard. I think the idea has some merit; although I wonder whether it wouldn't be smarter to put the code in the backend so that you don't need a parser in psql. The SHOW code could fall back to looking at these possibilities after it fails to find a match to a GUC variable name. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: