Re: PostGres Doubt
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostGres Doubt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1023963618.12488.0.camel@taru.tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostGres Doubt (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 19:38, Tom Lane wrote: > David Ford <david+cert@blue-labs.org> writes: > > So reentrancy in libpq basically is put on hold until 7.3. > > Only if you insist on using "crypt", which is deprecated anyway. > md5 is the preferred encryption method. > > My feeling about the proposed patch was that crypt is now a legacy auth > method, and it's not clear that we should create platform/library > dependencies just to support making multiple connections simultaneously > under crypt auth. (Note that *using* connections concurrently is not > at issue, only whether you can execute the authentication phase of > startup concurrently.) can't this be solved by simple locking ? I know that postgres team can do locking properly ;) -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: