Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1023.1379080728@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Ivan Voras (ivoras@freebsd.org) wrote: >> If I read the documentation correctly >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/pgupgrade.html), it needs >> oldbindir and newbindir arguments pointing to the directories of >> PostgreSQL executables for the old and new versions, making it basically >> unusable for upgrading systems which are maintained with packages >> instead of individually compiling & installing custom versions of >> PostgreSQL, right? (except possibly Debian which may allow multiple pg >> versions to be installed, I haven't tried it). > Uhm, don't basically all Debian-based and RedHat-based distributions > support having multiple major versions installed concurrently? It's a > pretty reasonable thing to need and, imv anyway, all packaging of PG > should support it. In Red Hat's own packaging, you should temporarily install the postgresql-upgrade RPM, which contains pg_upgrade as well as a copy of the previous-generation postmaster. If you use Devrim's packages, I think he more nearly follows the Debian approach. Either way, if a packager has failed to allow pg_upgrade to be usable within his package set(s), it's a packaging error that you should complain about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: