Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10226.1150511655@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes: > Interesting. We (some Japanese companies including SRA OSS, > Inc. Japan) did some PG scalability testing using a Unisys's big 16 > (physical) CPU machine and found PG scales up to 8 CPUs. However > beyond 8 CPU PG does not scale anymore. The result can be viewed at > "OSS iPedia" web site (http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp). Our conclusion was > PG has a serious lock contention problem in the environment by > analyzing the oprofile result. 18% in s_lock is definitely bad :-(. Were you able to determine which LWLock(s) are accounting for the contention? The test case seems to be spending a remarkable amount of time in LIKE comparisons, too. That probably is not a representative condition. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: