Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
От | Joshua Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1020950579.114171.1307467286074.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
9.1 release scheduling (was Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> iew. The > reason we usually skip the summer isn't actually a wholesale lack of > people - it's because it's not so good from a publicity perspective, > and it's hard to get all the packagers around at the same time. Actually, the summer is *excellent* from a publicity perspective ... at least, June and July are. Both of those months arefull of US conferences whose PR we can piggyback on to make a splash. August is really the only "bad" month from a PR perspective, because we lose a lot of our European RCs, and there's no bandwagonsto jump on. But even August has the advantage of having no major US or Christian holidays to interfere with releasedates. However, we're more likely to have an issue with *packager* availability in August. Besides, isn't this a little premature? Last I looked, we still have some big nasty open items. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: