Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | Ned Wolpert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1011646012.3517.23.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 09:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > As a PostgreSQL developer, I don't agree with the statement you made for > another reason: It implies that there is something better about the GPL > and we have to justify ourselves for not using it. We don't. We give > away the code we write with no strings attached, and anyone who wants to > question that has to come up with better arguments than I've heard so far. I agree with Peter here. There is no need to justify the license schema with PostgreSQL. However, I think people need to be clear (via FAQ, Readme, anything with a URL that we can point to people) so that when this question comes up, we simply direct them there and say, basically, "its a non-discusionable" -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: