Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10112.1200676093@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org> writes: > On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Zero cost and also zero benefit. The missing piece of information here >> was that the executable being used was running under PPC emulation, and >> I'll bet money that there would have been nothing in either uname or >> pg_config output that would have told us that. > I'd wager there would be a fairly good chance that a PPC-only binary > on a Mac would most likely have been built on a PPC, and thus mention > that in the uname output at build time. I can't imagine many folks are > building PPC-only binaries on Intels. uname is a separate executable. If you do system("uname") you'll get results that reflect how uname was built, not how Postgres was built. I think this is likely to lead to more confusion, not less --- if we'd had such output in the directory, it might have led us to disregard the clear evidence of the wrong-endian version number, and fruitlessly bark up some other tree instead. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: