Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, no, that's not very clear. A long-running transaction will be a
>> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin.
> Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current
> xid counter, rather than your own xid.
Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work.
regards, tom lane