Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1004.1154435157@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) ("Adrian Maier" <adrian.maier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
[ re cassowary buildfarm failure ] "Adrian Maier" <adrian.maier@gmail.com> writes: > On 20/07/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> As for the regression test failure, it's odd because it looks to me that >> the actual test output is an exact match to the default "float8.out" >> file. I'm not sure why pg_regress chose to report a diff against >> float8-small-is-zero. > Apparently the regression test is comparing the results/float8.out > with expected/float8-small-is-zero.out because of the following line > in > src/test/regress/resultmap : > float8/i.86-pc-cygwin=float8-small-is-zero Doh ... the question though is why are you getting different results from everybody else? There are other cygwin machines in the buildfarm and they are all passing regression --- I suppose they'd start failing if we remove that resultmap entry. The regular float8 result is certainly "more correct" than float8-small-is-zero, so I'm all for removing the resultmap entry if we can do it. But we'd need to be able to explain to people how to get their machines to pass, and right now I don't know what to say. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: