Re: replay WAL segments without a "base backup" ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replay WAL segments without a "base backup" ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10039.1250005754@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | replay WAL segments without a "base backup" ? (Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: replay WAL segments without a "base backup" ?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com> writes: > due to operator error at one of my client sites we're trying to restore a > deleted db. > We did a restore with a pgdump that went fine but the dump is 3weeks old. they > do have WAL segments and they claim that the WAL segments are exactly in line > with the needed transactions - from a timing perspective. However no base > backup with pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup() was ever run. > Is there any way to trick postgres into thinking that it needs to play fwd > these WAL's? Would it work to simply place them in a dir, create a > recovery.conf file pointing to that dir and restart the cluster? No, there is exactly 0 hope here. You would need a filesystem-level backup to work from. A restore from a pg_dump is not going to reproduce any of the low-level details (such as OID assignments or tuple placement) that WAL replay needs to have match. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: