Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10013.1583972967@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet (Virendra Kumar <viru_7683@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet
Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet |
Список | pgsql-general |
Virendra Kumar <viru_7683@yahoo.com> writes: > Can you please back port patch where if a 0 byte packet sent to PG instance (Health Checks), it starts complaining aboutinvalid startup packet and flood the log which increases log size considerably if the health checks are every 3 secondsor something like that. > Patch Requested - https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=patch;h=342cb650e We generally don't like to change behavior of back branches without ironclad agreement that the existing behavior is a bug ... which this surely isn't. Also, the discussion leading up to that patch specifically considered and rejected back-patching; so I'm disinclined to overrule that decision now. I would suggest that an every-three-second health check is not appropriate, especially one that is so minimal that it only detects whether the postmaster is alive. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: