Re: missing requirement on ccache in postgresql16-devel
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing requirement on ccache in postgresql16-devel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1000999.1698254504@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing requirement on ccache in postgresql16-devel (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing requirement on ccache in postgresql16-devel
Re: missing requirement on ccache in postgresql16-devel |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:25:15AM -0400, Greg Hennessy wrote: >> The file /usr/pgsql-16/lib/pgxs/src/Makefile.global has a reference >> to ccache but the rpm doesn't list this as a dependency. I would like >> to submit that it is a bug that it does not. > Uh, ccache is an _optional_ way to speed up compilation. It is not a > requirement/dependency. Yeah, but if the Makefile says "CC = ccache gcc" then anybody trying to build under PGXS will fail if they don't have ccache installed. So I think Greg has a point. On typical Red Hat setups, it's not necessary to mention ccache explicitly to use it; instead that's managed via PATH. For example, I have $ which gcc /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc $ ls -l /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 May 21 09:35 /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -> ../../bin/ccache so it Just Works. I'd suggest arranging the rpm builds to be done similarly, and then you get ccache usage in the rpm build, while the distributed Makefile will just say "CC = gcc" so it will work for users whether they use ccache or not. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: