Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10004.1479849358@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Well, the problem is that the stats data is not on disk while the system > is in operation, as far as I recall -- it's only in the collector's > local memory. On shutdown we tell it to write it down to a file, and on > startup we tell it to read it from the file and then delete it. I think > the rationale for this is to avoid leaving a file with stale data on > disk while the system is running. Maybe a workable compromise would be to leave the file present, and have the stats collector re-write it every (say) five minutes. Then I'd be okay with having an immediate shutdown skip writing the file; you'd be losing up to five minutes' worth of activity, but not going completely nuts. So the stats collector's normal activities would include writing the temp file on-demand and the permanent file on a timed cycle. The other components of the fix (deleting on PITR rewind or stats collector crash) would remain the same. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: