Re: Built-in connection pooler
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0fd2ee44-e75b-8d14-4192-641aa07d6c89@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in connection pooler (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in connection pooler
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.09.2020 8:07, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:38:02PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: >> Sorry, correct patch is attached. > This needs again a rebase, and has been waiting on author for 6 weeks > now, so I am switching it to RwF. > -- > Michael Attached is rebased version of the patch. I wonder what is the correct policy of handling patch status? This patch was marked as WfA 2020-07-01 because it was not applied any more. 2020-07-02 I have sent rebased version of the patch. Since this time there was not unanswered questions. So I actually didn't consider that some extra activity from my side is need. I have not noticed that patch is not applied any more. And now it is marked as returned with feedback. So my questions are: 1. Should I myself change status from WfA to some other? 2. Is there some way to receive notifications that patch is not applied any more? I can resubmit this patch to the next commitfest if it is still interesting for community. -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: