Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0f3cade5-99c0-4744-9623-e3eb142e1ae7@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/08/2017 06:39 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > These are already failing so I'd agree that explicit rejection isn't > necessary - the question seems restricted to usability. Though I suppose > we need to consider whether there is any problem with the current setup if > indeed our intended separator is also an allowable character - i.e., do we > want to future-proof the syntax by requiring quotes now? Hmm, there is one problem with our current use of comma as a separator: you cannot use a Unix-domain socket directory that has a comma in the name, because it's interpreted as multiple hostnames. E.g. this doesn't work: psql "host=/tmp/dir,with,commas" For hostnames, ports, and network addresses (hostaddr), a comma is not a problem, as it's not a valid character in any of those. I don't know if that was considered when this patch was developed. I couldn't find a mention of this in the archives. But in any case, that's quite orthogonal to the rest of this thread. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: