Re: UUID v7
От | Przemysław Sztoch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UUID v7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0e651911-b403-45ef-9da9-1e038e0884a1@sztoch.pl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UUID v7 (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: UUID v7
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
A lot of people use https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/uuid-ossp.html.
And `uuid_generate_v7()` will be the continuation...
From my point of view, absorbing uuid_generate_v5 into mainline would be a great move too.
On 26.11.2024 20:30, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:11 AM Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au> wrote:Changing the name uuidv7() to uuid_v7() is a bad idea because the RFC 9562 uses the term UUIDv7, and therefore code containing uuid_v7() will not be found by searching the web in most cases. It makes much more sense to rename it to get_uuidv7(), so that a query for "uuidv7" does not return a bunch of other unnecessary functions related to UUIDv7.Thank you for pointing it out. How about gen_uuidv7() and gen_uuidv4() as we already have gen_random_uuid()? Regards,
--
Przemysław Sztoch | Mobile +48 509 99 00 66
Przemysław Sztoch | Mobile +48 509 99 00 66
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: