Re: drop postmaster symlink
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: drop postmaster symlink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0e536d85-2b85-06a7-9051-be1bdf32852e@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | drop postmaster symlink (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/7/23 18:38, Tom Lane wrote: > "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@karlpinc.com> writes: >> This is a review of Peter's 2 patches. I see only 1 small problem. > >> Looking at the documentation, a "postmaster" in the glossary is >> defined as the controlling process. This works; it needs to be called >> something. There is still a postmaster.pid (etc.) in the data >> directory. > >> The word "postmaster" (case insensitive) shows up 84 times in the >> documentation. I looked at all of these. > > Hmm ... I thought this patch was about getting rid of the > admittedly-obsolete installed symlink. That was my understanding too. > If it's trying to get rid of the "postmaster" terminology for our > parent process, I'm very strongly against that, either as regards to > code or documentation. +1 -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: