Re: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0d6babc9ffd335086b3f56a2cb3de94f@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-01-21 17:12, Tom Lane wrote: > Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> writes: >> With the pdf increasingly in readability-decline (more and more text >> parts fall off the (right) side of the page and quite a few tables >> contain unreable bits) I would like to have a single page html. > > Given the size of our manual, I find it hard to believe that most > readers would perform acceptably with that ... have you tried just > concatenating all the parts manually and testing performance? > Yes, id did a straightforward concatenation; and it's really not a problem: it comes to a 15 MB file (12 MB when skipping the release pages). Either size (in standard firefox) takes some time (seconds) but scrolling and searching is no problem. Maybe I wasn't clear: I wouldn't argue to make single-file the default output, of course; just an option to choose if it's at all possible. And even if such an option isn't deemed feasible I was hoping that someone more xslt-knowledgeable than I am has some hints on how to produce a single html file in the correct order and with link correctly (self-)referencing. I might figure it out myself - in that case will post here. thanks, Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: