Re: Is there a significant difference in Memory settings between 9.5and 12
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is there a significant difference in Memory settings between 9.5and 12 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0cec61f5-ae6d-d789-ace6-eb89cbb473cb@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is there a significant difference in Memory settings between 9.5and 12 (Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/11/20 1:42 PM, Tory M Blue wrote: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us > <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote: > > Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com <mailto:tmblue@gmail.com>> writes: > > 12 will not start at 10GB, even though it's the same hardware, > same config > > file, same physical box, same everything, just version 12 vs 9.5 > > For me, using all-default settings (in particular, shared_buffers = > 128MB), the shared memory block is about 141.6MB using 9.5 and 142.1MB > using 12. So there's half a meg or so of additional data in v12, but > certainly not gigabytes worth. > > Are you trying to start both postmasters concurrently? Maybe you're > hitting some kernel limit on the total amount of shared memory in the > system. > > regards, tom lane > > > Hey Tom > > Nope, just a single one that is why i'm flummoxed :) I've even rebooted, > but I can't start Postgres 12 with my current setting of 10GB, I can So what is the error output from console, Postgres log and/or system log? > start 9.5 with 10GB configured. I've tried, shutting down 9.5 and > rebooting so nothing is running and attempting to start 12 and nada, it > won't unless I drop the Shared Buffers down to 5GB (half).. But these > are dedicated postgresql servers. And in fact my latest migrations, > don't even have 9.5 binaries anymore and 12 will not start with my 9.5 > configuration of 10GB buffers. So something feels really different. > > It's very possible that there are new defaults , new memory settings > that I'm not finding in the default postgresql 12 .conf file, and my > include is not overwriting it. But really I just can't fathom what that > could be.. Buffers, work mem, effective cache, what would they have added? > > I am going to pull the settings from postgres itself and compare 12 and > 9.5 to see if there is something glaring. > > Thanks! :) > Tory -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: