Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0cb923ce-b384-f0f6-5f90-7a3ebd42f660@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/18/18 11:53 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:26:41PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> On 11/18/18 1:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> On 11/17/18 9:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>>> In the long run, I think we should add an option to processSQLNamePattern >>>> to use OR instead of AND, which would fix both this problem as well as >>>> pg_dump's. I don't think that's important enough to stall this patch. > Agreed. This patch is useful in itself. This option would be nice to > have, and this routine interface would begin to grow too many boolean > switches to my taste so I'd rather use some flags instead. > > The patch is doing its work, however I have spotted an issue in the > format of the dumps generated. Each time an excluded database is > processed its set of SET queries (from _doSetFixedOutputState) as well > as the header "PostgreSQL database dump" gets generated. I think that > this data should not show up. I'll take a look. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: