Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS

On 05/23/2017 06:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 17 May 2017 at 14:30, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan
>> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Inheriting variables from the environment is a part of make by design.
>>> We have PG_PROVE_FLAGS for our own forced settings.
>> I don't buy this argument.  We've had previous cases where we've gone
>> through and added -X to psql invocations in the regression tests
>> because, if you don't, some people's .psqlrc files may cause tests to
>> fail, which nobody wants.  The more general principle is that the
>> regression tests should ideally pass regardless of the local machine
>> configuration.  It's proven impractical to make that universally true,
>> but that doesn't make it a bad goal.  Now, for all I know it may be
>> that setting PROVE_FLAGS can never cause a regression failure, but I
>> still tend to agree with Peter that the regression tests framework
>> should insulate us from the surrounding environment rather than
>> absorbing settings from it.
>>
> In that case we're going to need to invent a way to do this similarly
> in vcregress.pl. I'm not simply going to revert to the situation where
> it and the makefiles are completely out of sync on this. The previous
> patch was made more or less by ignoring the existence of vcregress.pl.
>
> I will look at this again probably after pgcon. I don't think it's
> terribly urgent.
>


Here's a patch that should do that. If this is acceptable I'll do this
and put the makefiles back the way they were.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers