Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0b59536a-2d31-7573-6505-1860d00618bd@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 3/4/18 16:09, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> If you want to do this soon I can put out a Buildfarm Client release >>> fairly quickly. > >> I think the dependency is mostly the other way around. How quickly >> would build farm owners install the upgrade? > > IIUC, the buildfarm script patch is only needed to avoid duplicate > tests. So owners need only install it if they want to reduce wasted > cycles on their machines. That being the case, it's only urgent to > the extent that the individual owner perceives it to be. Some might > think it is so, so I'd like to see the BF release available before > we push the TAP test ... but we don't have to wait very long between. It seems the consensus is that we'll need a build farm update before we can move forward with the patch and that we don't need to wait long for people to upgrade. Andrew, do you have a date for the next release? Thanks, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: