Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0a9c2968-3c2e-1c8b-a969-d51fc2a93cc3@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/5/17 2:50 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Ultimately, the question is whether the number of people running into > "Hey, I can't take pg_basebackup or setup a standby with the default > config!" is higher or lower than number of people running into "Hey, > CREATE TABLE + COPY is slower now!" I'm betting it's way higher. Loads of folks use Postgres and never do any kind of ETL. > That is not to say there are no other cases benefiting from those > optimizations, but we're talking about the default value - we're not > removing the wal_level=minimal. This would be a non-issue if we provided example configs for a few different workloads. Obviously those would never be optimal either, but they *would* show users what settings they should immediately look at changing in their environment. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: