Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0a861b1e-ad4a-2ca0-6530-8cfd6413225b@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/10/26 19:53, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Etsuro Fujita > <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> In practice, the search cost would be negligible compared to the cost of >> explaining/executing the query. >> >> My concern about your proposal is: it might not be worth complicating the >> code to solve a problem that is actually not a problem in practice. > To me the current code looks complicated esp. because of the recursion > involved and usage of out parameters to isSubqueryExpr(). I don't think so. isSubqueryExpr is prety small, written in less than 50 lines, and the code looks rather simple to me. > My > suggestion goes inline with the current method of deparsing a Var. Yeah, I think your approach makes it easy to search for the alias to a given Var from the array you proposed. I think the complexity of your approach would be in extra work for building and maintaining the array while deparsing the query. I think that would probably need more invasive and much larger changes to the existing code than what I proposed. I think this issue is optional, so I'd like to propose to leave this for the committer's judge. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: