Re: Access a newer Version of PGDB (v13) with an older libpq (v10 x86)
От | WR |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Access a newer Version of PGDB (v13) with an older libpq (v10 x86) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0a6cd677-b7f1-ed10-97d5-d62ada5d3d19@freenet.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Access a newer Version of PGDB (v13) with an older libpq (v10 x86) (Wolfgang Rißler <wolfgang.rissler@freenet.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 03.05.2021 um 10:41 schrieb Laurenz Albe: > On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 12:59 +0200, Wolfgang Rißler wrote: >> Am 30.04.2021 um 16:16 schrieb Tom Lane: >>> I would recommend trying to use a reasonably late-vintage libpq; we do >>> fix bugs in it on a regular basis. >>> The common stumbling block for cross-version situations is that the >>> client makes assumptions about system catalog contents that are not >>> valid in some other server release. libpq proper doesn't really touch >>> the catalogs, so it's mostly impervious to that problem; but you'll need >>> to test your applications. >> >> Of course we'll do. One thing is, that we load and write bytea's. And as >> I read, there have been some changes. All other Operations are less >> problematic. > > Version 9.0 changed the default "bytea" output format to hexadecimal. > If you want the old text output format, set "bytea_output" to "escape". > > If you output "bytea"s in binary form, nothing has changed. > This is a useful hint. I did this already in my PG10 <-> libpq10(x86) testinstallation. Thank you. -- May the source be with you
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: