Re: deprecating the use of OIDs
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: deprecating the use of OIDs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0a20215fe3dee20c44e330c750df7b62@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | deprecating the use of OIDs (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: deprecating the use of OIDs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I think most people on this list will agree that having OIDs on user > tables is a Bad Thing. For some previous discussion of why, see: > ... > Objections, comments, etc. are welcome. The GUC route sounds good. I'd like to see ctid handling beefed up at the same time. For example, some operators such as != would be nice and might ease the pain a little for people used to using oids as their "tuple id" :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200309291818 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE/eK/lvJuQZxSWSsgRAtvWAKDViOL/pohprP0ocQilFirfoCgvHwCg3Vrm zD8P1atONRt2XtGutbToSh0= =RX5j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: