Re: Performance RAID 0
От | Fernando Hevia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance RAID 0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0F9A0A4DE67544AAA542C0F778452352@iptel.com.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance RAID 0 (mange <lirarmange@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> -----Mensaje original----- > De: mange > > Hi, > I have a pretty small database on my home computer (~25Gb). I > have three 250Gb HDDs. > > My setup was 1 HDD for OS (Windows XP) and the other 2 HDD > in RAID 0 for postgre database. > Will I see any performance improvement if I instead have 1 > HDD for OS, 1 HDD for pg_xlog and 1HDD for the database? > > or do you suggest another setup? > (I'm not really concerned about the redundancy for the > database, that's why I used RAID 0 up till now, but would > save some time if the performance difference is small > compared to 3 independent disks) > > /Magnus > No. In your scenario, if you proceed in having individual disks attending data and pg_xlog, I bet performance will be degraded. For maximum performance you should construct your RAID 0 array with all three disks for OS and Postgres. Of course thats quite risky. You are tripling your chances the whole box will evaporate in case of a disk failure. Cheers.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: