Re: contrib/pg_freespacemap

On Aug 8, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 8/8/09 10:50 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>>> Is there any reason we didn't move the pg_freespace function from
>>>> contrib to core?
>>> Is there a reason we *should* move it?  The current definition  
>>> doesn't
>>> leave me feeling that it's more than a low-level hacker's tool.
>>
>> No specific reason.  I was just wondering because I saw an old  
>> message
>> about it.  Maybe we just don't need it.
>
> Given that the FSM is now auto-managing, is there any reason to have
> this tool at all?
>
> Seems like it should get killed off.


I believe it's useful when dealing with very bloated relations. If  
someone's looking for an itch to scratch, ways to more effectively  
shrink bloated relations would be good.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828