Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
От | Henrik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0E80D962-22F4-4669-B09F-E1E44449BF76@mac.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server |
Список | pgsql-performance |
9 aug 2008 kl. 00.47 skrev Greg Smith: > On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Henrik wrote: > >> It feels like there is something fishy going on. Maybe the RAID 10 >> implementation on the PERC/6e is crap? > > Normally, when a SATA implementation is running significantly faster > than a SAS one, it's because there's some write cache in the SATA > disks turned on (which they usually are unless you go out of your > way to disable them). Since all non-battery backed caches need to > get turned off for reliable database use, you might want to double- > check that on the controller that's driving the SATA disks. Lucky for my I have BBU on all my controllers cards and I'm also not using the SATA drives for database. That is why I bought the SAS drives :) Just got confused when the SATA RAID 5 was sooo much faster than the SAS RAID10, even random writes. But I should have realized that SAS is only faster if the number of drives are equal :) Thanks for the input! Cheers, Henke > > > -- > * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com > Baltimore, MD > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > ) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: