Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0C0FFDB7-9E62-49AB-8BA7-842D2B1F375A@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I don't think this really qualifies as "in place upgrade" since it would mean creating a whole second copy of all your data. And it's only online got read-only queries too. I think we need a way to upgrade the pages in place and deal with any overflow data as exceptional cases or else there's hardly much point in the exercise. greg On 5 Nov 2008, at 07:32 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> An old page which never goes away. New page formats are introduced >> for a >> reason -- to support new features. An old page lying around >> indefinitely means >> some pages can't support those new features. Just as an example, >> DBAs may be >> surprised to find out that large swathes of their database are >> still not >> protected by CRC checksums months or years after having upgraded to >> 8.4 (or >> even 8.5 or 8.6 or ...). They would certainly want a way to ensure >> all their >> data is upgraded. > > OK, I see your point. In the absence of any old snapshots, > convert-on-write allows you to forcibly upgrade the whole table by > rewriting all of the tuples into new pages: > > UPDATE table SET col = col > > In the absence of page expansion, you can put logic into VACUUM to > upgrade each page in place. > > If you have both old snapshots that you can't get rid of, and page > expansion, then you have a big problem, which I guess brings us back > to Heikki's point. > > ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: