Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time
От | Henrik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0B6E17E9-DE1B-424D-8757-1C95646FD3DA@mac.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time
|
Список | pgsql-general |
6 dec 2007 kl. 20.26 skrev Alvaro Herrera: > Henrik wrote: > >> I think I have a clue why its so off. We update a value in that >> table about >> 2 - 3 million times per night and as update creates a new row it >> becomes >> bloated pretty fast. The table hade a size of 765 MB including >> indexes and >> after vacuum full and reindex it went down to 80kB... I guess I need >> routine reindex on this table. Thank god is not big. :) > > I suggest you put a lone VACUUM on that table in cron, say once > every 5 > minutes, and you should be fine. You shouldn't need a reindex at all. Instead of cron can't I just have really aggressive autovacuum settings on this table? Thanks, Henke > > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/ > "Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a > rumor that > you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise. > It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle) > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: