Re: Getting a sample data set.
От | Alban Hertroys |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting a sample data set. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A7F7B56-42FF-4079-8A8A-C394E02FBBC9@solfertje.student.utwente.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting a sample data set. ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Getting a sample data set.
Re: Getting a sample data set. |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 18 Jan 2011, at 19:59, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Tue, January 18, 2011 13:23, Alban Hertroys wrote: >> >> >> Standard SQL alternatives tend to get complex, using self-joins to >> weed out all the records you don't want (the exact term for such >> joins escapes me right now, that would help with Googling if you're >> looking for examples). > > Would the term be a grouped self join? Nope, but some Googling put me on the right track. It's called a correlated subquery. > I can see the motivation for something like DISTINCT ON. I take it > that this syntax is peculiar to PostgreSQL?: I suppose you meant particular? Yes, definitely. Although I'm sure some would find it peculiar as well :) Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:737,4d35e9d011708045415059!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: