Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Tuesday, August 28, 2007 21:15:50 +0200 Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:


> Yeah. And you think the presence of PostgreSQL Inc isn't a problem
> today? No offense to Marc, both he and PostgreSQL Inc has done a lot of
> good things, but it certainly does *not* help the community to have a
> company named the same way as our OSS product that claims 7.4 has just
> been released and nothing has happened with us since 7.4.

There is actually a *huge* difference here ... joshua will/would be actively
pushing/marketing "Postgres, Inc" ... PostgreSQL, Inc hasn't done either for
over 2 years now ... I've even started to scale back the web site itself ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFG1Kyc4QvfyHIvDvMRAqbwAKCg7li2DmZbVqSydTTOUWgrfhPlnQCgvr9/
UAzwaTHFpL5uZB87BPPn2Jc=
=EF/n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----