Re: tab completion for setting search_path
От | Bernd Helmle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tab completion for setting search_path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 095C748792186DC819637750@apophis.credativ.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tab completion for setting search_path (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On 3. Mai 2014 10:11:33 +0200 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 6d26ffc..dec3d4a >> *** a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c >> --- b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c >> *************** psql_completion(const char *text, int st >> *** 3230,3235 **** >> --- 3230,3242 ---- >> >> COMPLETE_WITH_LIST(my_list); >> } >> + else if (pg_strcasecmp(prev2_wd, "search_path") == 0) >> + { >> + COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_schemas >> + " AND nspname not like 'pg\\_%%' " >> + " AND nspname not like 'information_schema' " >> + " UNION SELECT 'DEFAULT' "); >> + } > > Why should we exclude system schemata? That seems more likely to be > confusing than helpful? I can see a point in excluding another backend's > temp tables, but otherwise? I put my hands on this a while ago, too, but had a different notion in mind, which schema the completion should select. I came up with the following: <http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/bernd/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=03fd00cd190e8b529efeec1a1bb038454fb0b05f> Just complete to a schema someone has CREATE or USAGE privs. However, the reason i stopped working on it was that i really want to have a completion to a list of schemas as well and i couldn't figure a good and easy way to do this atm. -- Thanks Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: