Re: Pet Peeves
От | Adam Rich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pet Peeves |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 08ae01c98428$300fa620$902ef260$@r@sbcglobal.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Pet Peeves
Re: Pet Peeves |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:16:17 +0000 Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote: > So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it > do some things which rub you the wrong way? I see all the major ones have already been mentioned, so here's some minor ones. - lack of system-level and DDL triggers - inability to limit triggers to certain columns - inability to know the DML operation causing a trigger - date_part/extract returning floats instead of integer - parts of the SQL statement (e.g. 'for update of') requiring table aliases when present instead of table names. - lack of queryable high-water marks useful for tuning - lack of an auto-tuner, for that matter. - inability to log (e.g. long-running queries) to a table - lack of custom session-level variables (without editing postgresql.conf) - lack of autonomous transactions
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: