Re: Question on simulating Enum Data type
От | Morgan Kita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on simulating Enum Data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 08B420FF5BF7BC42A064212C2EB7688017E47C@neutron.verseon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question on simulating Enum Data type ("Morgan Kita" <mkita@verseon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question on simulating Enum Data type
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hmm still I wonder, won't the varchar/char compares be much slower than using a seperate map table, grabbing the int value,and then only doing int compares? Maybe somebody can enlighten me on the relative speed of queries involving stringcompares vs queries on int compares. -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:58 PM To: Morgan Kita Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Question on simulating Enum Data type "Morgan Kita" <mkita@verseon.com> writes: > However, I am a little concerned about performance in that case. If I > use domain constraints and keep the choices as strings then a string > comparison will be done whenver I query on this field right? Hm? A domain constraint would cost cycles when storing into the table, but not when querying it. Joining to another table, on the other hand, will cost you during queries. If the strings are long, so that the amount of extra space involved adds up to a lot, it'd probably make sense to go with integer codes. But if they're just a word or so then I'd lean to keeping it simple.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: