Re: Approving request of announcement
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Approving request of announcement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 08967C10-0B95-408B-AC1C-82FABB3FA727@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Approving request of announcement (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Approving request of announcement
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> So far only people who actually organize conferences have said anything >> though. It would be appreciated if at least one non-organizer informs us of >> their opinion :) > > I don't think I qualify for that and I'm ok with the idea of adding > this. I would perhaps be happier if we removed one of the others to > make room for it but none of them stand out as obviously terrible > either. I would be fine with removing “Registration Open,” and I say this as an organizer who of course would love to have more publicityaround a conference. For PGConf US, we typically open registration as soon as we announce the CFP, and lookingat other community conferences the process seems to be “CFP => Schedule Posting => Registration Closing” as the typicalannouncements. OTOH we’ve rarely had any “Wrap Up” emails go out - I see maybe 1 per year from any community conference? - so maybe we justadd the additional email topic. Jonathan
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: