Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows
От | Arnaud L. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 07b4526e-1bff-654c-4cc0-9dd6b72e0ca8@codata.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade --link on Windows ("Arnaud L." <arnaud.listes@codata.eu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Le 9/06/2017 à 17:02, Arnaud L. a écrit : > Le 9/06/2017 à 16:55, Adrian Klaver a écrit : >> On 06/09/2017 07:39 AM, Arnaud L. wrote: >>> So maybe pg_upgrade uses hard-links (i.e. to files), and only the >>> documentation is wrong by calling them junctions (i.e. soft links to >>> files) ? >> >> Looks that way. In file.c in ~/src/bin/pg_upgrade I see: >> >> #ifdef WIN32 >> 300 /* implementation of pg_link_file() on Windows */ >> 301 static int >> 302 win32_pghardlink(const char *src, const char *dst) >> 303 { >> 304 /* >> 305 * CreateHardLinkA returns zero for failure >> 306 * http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363860(VS.85).aspx >> 307 */ >> 308 if (CreateHardLinkA(dst, src, NULL) == 0) >> 309 { >> 310 _dosmaperr(GetLastError()); >> 311 return -1; >> 312 } >> 313 else >> 314 return 0; >> 315 } >> 316 #endif > > Great ! > So I did a full upgrade for nothing (just for safety), but that's good > to know for next time ! > Should this be submitted to postgresql-bugs, or is there something more > specific to the documentation ? I just found the pgsql-docs@postgresql.org list, for for the spam. -- Arnaud
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: