Re: monitoring database activity on solaris
| От | David Parker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: monitoring database activity on solaris |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 07FDEE0ED7455A48AC42AC2070EDFF7C5CF521@corpsrv2.tazznetworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | monitoring database activity on solaris ("David Parker" <dparker@tazznetworks.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: monitoring database activity on solaris
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
OK, thanks. We're using pg_ctl to start it at the moment, but we can obviously change that. - DAP >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] >Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:18 PM >To: David Parker >Cc: postgres general >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] monitoring database activity on solaris > >"David Parker" <dparker@tazznetworks.com> writes: >> According to the 7.4 doc section on monitoring database >activity, one >> should be able to see the current activity happening in a given >> postgres process. It mentions that on Solaris (which we are running >> on) you need to use /usr/ucb/ps, and it also says >> >> " your original invocation of the postmaster command must have a >> shorter ps status display than that provided by each server process " > >Yeah. This is a Solaris peculiarity that we only figured out >by chance. >The best bet is to make sure that your postmaster start script >invokes the postmaster as > postmaster >no more. No path (set PATH beforehand instead). No >command-line switches (whatever you might want there can be >put into postgresql.conf instead). Redirection is OK, but >keep the command line itself to a minimum. "postmaster" and >nothing else will be shorter than any of the ps display >settings the postmaster's children use ... but if you have a >bunch of command-line arguments, it'll be longer, and Solaris' >ps will choose to display the wrong thing. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: