Re: [PATCH] ProcessInterrupts_hook

On 1/19/21 1:42 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 12:44, Craig Ringer 
> <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com <mailto:craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>> 
> wrote:
> 
>          > We're about halfway there already, see 7e784d1dc.  I didn't
>         do the
>          > other half because it wasn't necessary to the problem, but
>         exposing
>          > the shutdown state more fully seems reasonable.
> 
>     Excellent, I'll take a look. Thanks.
> 
> That looks very handy already.
> 
> Extending it to be set before SIGTERM too would be handy.
> 
> My suggestion, which I'm happy to post in patch form if you think it's 
> reasonable <snip>

Tom, Robert, and thoughts on the proposals in [1]?

Craig, based on the state of this proposal (i.e. likely not a candidate 
for PG14) I think it makes sense to move it to the next CF.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGRY4nyNfscmQiZBCNT7cBYnQxJLAAVCGz%2BGZAQDAco1Fbb01w%40mail.gmail.com