Re: Connections on cluster not being logged
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connections on cluster not being logged |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 06eeef2e-48ba-c4d0-efd7-f71a656d6764@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Connections on cluster not being logged (Sandy Becker <sjb6925@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Connections on cluster not being logged
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 07/23/2018 12:50 PM, Sandy Becker wrote: Please reply to list also. Ccing list. > Two servers set up in a hardware cluster for automatic failover. That's > all I know about it. Alright, so which server's logs are you looking at? Long term it would be a good thing to know how the cluster/failover is setup, as that is something folks on this list are going to ask when attempting to answer a question. Just trying to get ahead of the inevitable:) > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Adrian Klaver > <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote: > > On 07/23/2018 08:14 AM, Sandy Becker wrote: > > I have postgresql 9.4 on a cluster, hardware based. I need to > be able to see which users are connecting to which database and > when to be in compliance with our security policies. > > I have set the following in the postgresql.conf and did a pg_ctl > reload: > > log_connections = on > log_line_prefix = '%t [%p]:[%u]:[%h]-[%d] [%1-1]' > > Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be logging the connections. > This is what I have used on our non-clustered instances and it's > working as expected. Have I missed something relating to > logging on a cluster? The second node is strictly for > automatice failover, so nothing is actually running there at the > moment. > > > Can you define what you mean by a cluster? > > > > > Thank you in advance for any suggestions. > > Sandy > > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: