Re: BUG #1988: keygen not implemented
От | Mike Clements |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1988: keygen not implemented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 06B12D1D68BCCA4CB1F60BB4EA509768245260@pq-exch01.actional.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #1988: keygen not implemented ("Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for the info. I found a workaround by selecting the current value of= the sequence after doing the insert. This however is not desirable since i= t requires another round trip call to the DB, and it requires PostGRE SQL s= pecific code in my "generic" JDBC client. If the driver supported getGenera= tedKeys(), client applications could perform better and be truly generic. Also looking at the release notes I see I'm not the only person asking for = this feature... Good luck. > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Jowett [mailto:oliver@opencloud.com]=20 > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 2:24 PM > To: Mike Clements > Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1988: keygen not implemented >=20 > Mike Clements wrote: >=20 > > Insert a row into the table using: > > Connection.prepareStatement(sql, Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS); > > The driver throws an exception saying this method is not=20 > yet implemented. >=20 > This is an optional part of the JDBC spec, and the driver=20 > doesn't claim=20 > to support it in the metadata it provides=20 > (DatabaseMetaData.supportsGetGeneratedKeys() returns false). >=20 > > What it should do is create the prepared statement so when=20 > you execute it, > > the returned ResultSet has the generated primary key. >=20 > Unfortunately this requires functionality in the backend that=20 > does not=20 > yet exist (support for "INSERT .. RETURNING ...", or similar). >=20 > -O >=20 >=20
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: