Re: postgres hot-standby questions.
От | Scott Ribe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres hot-standby questions. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 06AC2E5A-2205-4CF5-82E6-9C35FBDDBF7F@elevated-dev.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres hot-standby questions. ("Graeme B. Bell" <grb@skogoglandskap.no>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres hot-standby questions.
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mar 26, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Graeme B. Bell <grb@skogoglandskap.no> wrote: > > Assuming that you have your server configured with 1 or more hot standbys. > Are there situations where it is smart & sane to allow a controlled (slow, not emergency) shutdown to complete asynchronouslywithout knowing if any standby got the last bits of wal? Sure. Point updates. Shut down 9.4.0. Immediately re-start 9.4.1 on the same cluster. OS security update, reboot server, PG shuts down and re-starts on boot. Etc. I don't care in those cases what the state of the network and my remote replicas are. The replication is interrupted briefly,and then resumes. -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/ (303) 722-0567 voice
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: