Re: Remove one use of IDENT_USERNAME_MAX
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove one use of IDENT_USERNAME_MAX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 062cc5e1-554e-7f5d-b7ea-1d9888679680@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove one use of IDENT_USERNAME_MAX (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-10-29 15:34, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2019-10-28 14:45, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> writes: >>>> In think one of the reasons for the coding is the fact that *pw is >>>> described to be placed in the static area, which can be overwritten by >>>> succeeding calls to getpw*() functions. > >>> Good point ... so maybe pstrdup instead of using a fixed-size buffer? > >> Maybe. Or we just decide that check_usermap() is not allowed to call >> getpw*(). It's just a string-matching routine, so it doesn't have any >> such business anyway. > > I'm okay with that as long as you add a comment describing this > assumption. Committed with a pstrdup(). That seemed more consistent with other code in that file. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: