Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
От | David Costa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 05B84CF0-87A3-11D8-8E74-000A95EB456A@dotgeek.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying (Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Apr 5, 2004, at 8:00 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> >> >> Article discussing PHP5 says SQLite is "typically faster than MySQL, >> significantly faster than PostgreSQL". While I don't doubt it's >> faster at what it does (with it's small, focused feature-set), the >> article perpuates the 'Postgres is slow' and 'MySQL is much faster >> than Postgres' thinking that is no longer accurate. > > I can confirm that SQLite is faster than either MySQL or PostgreSQL > when > using Bacula. I'm working on improving the PostgreSQL. Hi Dan! I am sure SQLite can be faster, but its not comparable with either MySQL or PostgreSQL so is this text based "db" http://txtsql.sourceforge.net/ I do have SQLite actively used in a number of sites (e.g. collegelinux.org) and frankly, for an end user standpoint specially of a size that might be interested in SQLite, there is really no humanly noticeable speed difference IMHO. When you talk about speed the average PHP developer is thinking about his guestbook or forum becoming slower with Pgsql and this is not true ;) Thanks David > > -- > Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: