Re: Parallel query execution with SPI
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel query execution with SPI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 05930e35-9034-e55c-fbd4-33f92bee3704@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel query execution with SPI (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.03.2017 13:48, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik > <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> It is possible to execute query concurrently using SPI? >> If so, how it can be enforced? >> I tried to open cursor with CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK flag but it doesn't help: >> query is executed by single backend while the same query been launched at >> top level uses parallel plan: >> >> fsstate->portal = SPI_cursor_open_with_args(NULL, fsstate->query, >> fsstate->numParams, argtypes, values, nulls, true, CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK); >> ... >> SPI_cursor_fetch(fsstate->portal, true, 1); > Parallel execution isn't possible if you are using a cursor-type > interface, because a parallel query can't be suspended and resumed > like a non-parallel query. If you use a function that executes the > query to completion in one go, like SPI_execute_plan, then it's cool. > See also commit 61c2e1a95f94bb904953a6281ce17a18ac38ee6d. > Thank you very much for explanation. In case of using SPI_execute the query is really executed concurrently. But it means that when I am executing some query using SPI, I need to somehow predict number of returned tuples. If it is not so much, then it is better to use SPI_execute to allow concurrent execution of the query. But if it is large enough, then SPI_execute without limit can cause memory overflow. Certainly I can specify some reasonable limit and it if is reached, then use cursor instead. But it is neither convenient, neither efficient. I wonder if somebody can suggest better solution? -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: