hi michael
thanks for your answer.
>> field m_list would idealy be a varchar if possible...
>
> Why? It could be done but an array seems more suitable for what
> you're describing.
yes. as far as i know, the ms odbc layer does not understand array-fields,
at least not asp3 where the db in question is used ;-)
if the field never has to be outputed to asp your solution will work. i'll
try to implement it, thanks again.
- thomas