Re: [pgAdmin III] #48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От pgAdmin Trac
Тема Re: [pgAdmin III] #48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename
Дата
Msg-id 054.9ebb992ecdc3a62b2d61fc4604dec8c4@code.pgadmin.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [pgAdmin III] #48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename  ("pgAdmin Trac" <trac@code.pgadmin.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
#48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  gleu       |       Owner:  dpage    
      Type:  feature    |      Status:  closed   
  Priority:  minor      |   Milestone:           
 Component:  pgadmin    |     Version:  1.8      
Resolution:  won't fix  |    Keywords:  adminpack
  Platform:  all        |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dpage):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => won't fix


Comment:

 Adminpack is a PostgreSQL contrib module, and issues should really be
 reported/discussed there.

 The reason for the format is to restrict the pg_logdir_ls output to only
 postgresql logfiles, when they may be present in directories used for
 other logs (consider /var/log). Constructing a filter based on a custom
 log_filename GUC is actually pretty hard to do.

--
Ticket URL: <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/48#comment:1>
pgAdmin III <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/>
pgAdmin III

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "pgAdmin Trac"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgAdmin III] #46: "Use Replication" label/field bug in Column Create/Edit Dialog
Следующее
От: svn@pgadmin.org
Дата:
Сообщение: SVN Commit by dpage: r8049 - trunk/pgadmin3